Long-term monitoring of beetle succession in decaying <I>Eucalyptus obliqua</I> logs.
Research Projects
About WARRA Biophysical Features Research Projects Publications Contact Us Links WARRA

Obtaining a Grant

Project Search
Project SearchLong Term Ecological Research
Project name: Long-term monitoring of beetle succession in decaying Eucalyptus obliqua logs.
Year started: 1999
Project number: WRA050
Primary investigator: Simon Grove
Other investigator(s): Alison Phillips, Andrew Muirhead, Dick Bashford, Marie Yee, Nita Ramsden, Rob Taylor
Enquiries: warra.enquiries@forestrytas.com.au
Organisation(s): Forestry Tasmania
Project type: Professional
Project status: Active

A log emergence trap on an old-growth Eucalyptus obliqua log.

A log emergence trap on an old-growth Eucalyptus obliqua log.

Image: Simon Grove

Emergence traps on a small-diameter (regrowth) Eucalyptus obliqua log, April 2002.

Emergence traps on a small-diameter (regrowth) Eucalyptus obliqua log, April 2002.

Image: Simon Grove

Some of the beetles sorted from the first year of sampling.

Some of the beetles sorted from the first year of sampling.

Image: Simon Grove

Project summary:

Concern over the conservation implications of declining availability of large logs in Tasmania’s wet eucalypt production forests managed on relatively short rotations led to the establishment of a long-term experiment aimed at comparing succession in saproxylic beetles in large-diameter (mature) and small-diameter (regrowth) logs. The first sampling cycle spanned the first five years following the felling of six mature-aged (>150 years) and six mature regrowth-aged (c75 years) Eucalyptus obliqua trees growing in a multi-aged forest study area at Warra in southern Tasmania. These were felled over three seasons from May (autumn) 1999 to February (summer) 2000.

A total of 11546 individuals and 311 species of saproxylic beetles were sampled from the twelve logs, and statistical estimators predicted a notional total species richness of about 359. Twenty species made up 75% of all the individuals, while many other species were rare, and 66 species were represented by singletons.

Seasonal patterns in abundance, species richness and assemblage composition were also evident. Species richness peaked in January, while abundance peaked in February. Different species showed different seasonal peaks and troughs, including species with winter peaks. The sampling cycle coincided with an initial pulse in abundance of saproxylic beetles, with sample-intensity-corrected summer peaks in abundance decreasing by a factor of four over the five summers sampled. The time-lag between felling and trap fitting did not noticeably influence this pattern. However, the height of the summer abundance peaks was related to the date of felling: those felled in autumn had more individuals emerging in the first three summers, while those felled in summer had more individuals emerging in the latter two summers. Different species showed different patterns in the degree and direction of their annual peaks over this period. While the peaks of many declined over the cycle, those of others increased or reached a maximum mid-way through the cycle.

Each species was categorised by its likely ‘saproxylicity’, mode of dispersal, feeding guild membership and microhabitat preferences. Obligately saproxylic species were more numerous than facultatively saproxylic species; species able to disperse by flight were much more numerous than crawlers; predators comprised the most abundant feeding guild; and there were roughly equal numbers of litter/surface dwelling and log interior-dwelling species. While the lower collecting bottles tended to preferentially sample ‘crawlers’ and the upper collecting bottles ‘fliers’, the capture of many individual species did not fit this pattern.

Species richness and abundance were positively correlated. Overall, mature logs yielded 26% more individuals and 30% more species than regrowth logs. However, there was so much variation among samples that there was no clear tendency for samples derived from a larger log volume or surface area to yield more individuals. This obviated the need to standardise sample size by volume or surface area – a process which generated nonsensical rates of species accumulation in regrowth logs. Standardising sample size instead by the number of individuals made little difference to the results of analyses of assemblage composition. These analyses consistently suggested that there were significant differences between mature and regrowth logs. Many of the twenty commonest species showed distinct ‘preferences’ for either mature or regrowth logs; some of these preferences could only be picked up in analyses that also considered sample season.

The findings from this study do not on their own point to mature logs being dramatically different from regrowth, but some subtle differences are evident. In combination with other studies (locally and elsewhere) they do suggest that both mature and regrowth logs support a rich saproxylic beetle fauna. They further suggest that a future forest lacking mature logs might not be able to support some saproxylic beetle species, including species whose close relatives in the more highly managed European forests are now on the verge of extinction.

Meanwhile, a related project has studied saproxylic beetles and fungi in logs in an intermediate decay stage.

Methodology:

Five emergence traps were progressively fitted to random 3 m sections of each resultant log at roughly three-monthly intervals, and each was left in place for about three years after which each was removed. For one mature-regrowth pair of logs this process started immediately after felling, while for the five other pairs progressively longer lag-times were applied, ranging from six to 24 months. This first sampling cycle is conceived as the first of many as the logs gradually decay over the coming decades (or even centuries).

Datasets:

None available.

Publications:

Bashford, R., Taylor, R., Driessen, M., Doran, N. & Richardson, A. (2001). Research on invertebrate assemblages at the Warra LTER Site.Tasforests 13: 109-118.

Grove, S.J. & Bashford, R. (2003). Beetle assemblages from the Warra log decay project: insights from the first year of sampling. Tasforests 14: 117-129.

Grove, S.J. & Bashford, R. (2005). Warra log decay project: establishment report. Forestry Tasmania, Hobart.

Grove, S. & Forster, L. (2011). A decade of change in the saproxylic beetle fauna of eucalypt logs in the Warra long-term log-decay experiment, Tasmania. Forestry Tasmania Technical Report, Hobart.

Grove, S.J. & Forster, L. (2011). A decade of change in the saproxylic beetle fauna of eucalypt logs in the Warra long-term log-decay experiment, Tasmania. 1. Description of the fauna and seasonality patterns. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 2149-2165.

Grove, S.J. & Forster, L. (2011). A decade of change in the saproxylic beetle fauna of eucalypt logs in the Warra long-term log-decay experiment, Tasmania. 2. Log-size effects, succession, and the functional significance of rare species. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 2167-2188.

Grove, S.J. (2009). A decade of deadwoodology at Warra. The Tasmanian Naturalist 131: 25-35.

Grove, S., Bashford, R. & Yee, M. (2009). A long-term experimental study of saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) succession in Tasmanian Eucalyptus obliqua logs: findings from the first five years. Chapter 6 in: Fattorini, S. (Ed.), Insect Ecology and Conservation. Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp. 71-114.

Wardlaw, T., Grove, S., Hopkins, A., Yee, M., Harrison K. & Mohammed, C. (2009). The uniqueness of habitats in old eucalypts: contrasting wood-decay fungi and saproxylic beetles of young and old eucalypts. Tasforests 18: 17-32.

Yuan, Z.-Q. (2000). Long term monitoring of log decay in old growth forest at Warra (a summary report on initial establishment of the study). University of Tasmania, Hobart.

top